Eunice Atuejide, former presidential candidate of the National Interest Party and a member of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), has defended former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi amid allegations made against him by former Labour Party spokesperson Kenneth Okonkwo.
Speaking during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, June 11, 2026, Atuejide emphasized the importance of accountability and transparency in public leadership, arguing that political figures must be willing to face scrutiny if they expect to earn and maintain public trust.
Addressing the controversy surrounding Obi, Atuejide said one of the reasons many Nigerians continue to support the former presidential candidate is the belief that he remains open to public examination and criticism. She maintained that leaders should not shy away from questions about their conduct and records.
“I do not want to follow a man who has a criminal record and whom the public cannot scrutinize,” she said, while challenging Kenneth Okonkwo to present any evidence he claims to have against Obi through appropriate legal and public channels.
According to Atuejide, the ongoing legal dispute between the parties provides an opportunity for all allegations to be properly examined and tested through due process. She argued that transparency benefits both political leaders and their supporters, as it helps establish confidence in those seeking public office.
The NDC member further stated that her support for Obi is based on what she described as his longstanding reputation for accountability, prudent management of resources, and commitment to public service. She noted that if credible evidence exists to challenge that perception, it should be openly presented and subjected to legal scrutiny rather than speculation.
Atuejide concluded by stressing that democratic societies thrive when citizens have access to accurate information about political leaders. She expressed confidence that the truth surrounding the allegations against Obi would ultimately be determined by evidence and lawful processes rather than public rhetoric.
